On May 31, 11:26 pm, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do think we are getting into muddy waters here by not giving
> > anonymous/registered users the ability to modify the docs, or even to
> > provide comments on a page by page basis. While the look and feel is
> > much nicer and cleaner, I wonder if we have taken a step backwards in
> > regards to capabilities.
>
> Well, I think that we ought to add some javascript based way to do
> commenting on the docs pages because is somewhat helpful. I do think
> it's important to note that most of the comments we gout on the old
> doc wiki were spam, and most of the non-spam comments were not
> particularly valuable. Besides that I think Chris Arndt is right is
> saying that we should really encourage doc-fixed to go into trac just
> like any other bug.
>
How about a form that displays the ReST in an edit box and upon
submitting it a patch is automatically generated and attached to a
Trac ticket. So upon the submit button being pressed run a script on
the doc server that performs the following:
* update the docs folder in the sandbox (performed on the doc server)
* overwrite the file being edited
* create a patch for the file being edited
* create a Trac ticket
* attach a patch to the ticket
That way a user wanting to make a change to the docs does not have
much of a burden and the changes are not immediately applied but
submitted to a ticket for approval. I could stub out a script for
this if someone wants to integrate it into the docs server.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
