Hi all, I have discussed today with python developpers from other projects and one of the remarks I noted was that the version numbering we choose make them feel like TG is not evolving. While pondering this I felt like they were quite right. Why keep 1.1 as a number for our next iteration? I feel like the next big one should be 1.2 (1.1 head as it is now) and next next shinny one 1.5 (the one based on 1.1 branch but with all the goals we wanted --> no more tg widgets and all the fluff).
I am prep'ing an 1.0.4.5 release for tomorrow, and would like to release an 1.2 (the head of the 1.1 branch). This would help maintain existing applications for people who cannot migrate to 1.2. And this would help people adopt our 1.2 technos a bit more. I tell you directly: you need really strong and based arguments to change/stop this, because we badly need some perceived movement on the TG scene and this is one of the ways to get some. Florent. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
