On Sat, 2008-21-06 at 23:46 +0200, Florent Aide wrote: > Hi all, > > I have discussed today with python developpers from other projects and > one of the remarks I noted was that the version numbering we choose > make them feel like TG is not evolving. > While pondering this I felt like they were quite right. Why keep 1.1 > as a number for our next iteration? I feel like the next big one > should be 1.2 (1.1 head as it is now) and next next shinny one 1.5 > (the one based on 1.1 branch but with all the goals we wanted --> no > more tg widgets and all the fluff). > > I am prep'ing an 1.0.4.5 release for tomorrow, and would like to > release an 1.2 (the head of the 1.1 branch). This would help maintain > existing applications for people who cannot migrate to 1.2. And this > would help people adopt our 1.2 technos a bit more. > > I tell you directly: you need really strong and based arguments to > change/stop this, because we badly need some perceived movement on the > TG scene and this is one of the ways to get some.
+1 from me. Thanks for thinking about this stuff. Genshi, SA, and ToscaWidgets are really great libraries and we should make it clear that 1.whatever_that_makes is a big step forward. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
