nice work. it all works smashingly now. cheers. -chris
On Oct 28, 11:05 pm, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so I've added beautiful soup, webtest, and upgraded the > dependencies below. And a quick test on my mac shows that for some > reason virtualenv is not respecting the --no-site-packages options on > my machine. > > So, I used a ubuntu VMWare image to test this install and everything > seems to have worked this time. > > I also updated some stuff so that my local only tests that were broken > aren't in the release any more. So, hopefully this is all good now.. > > --Mark Ramm > > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Derick Eisenhardt > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Finally got it to work! > > > This method worked for me. > > > just a little note, you can chain this into the same line: > > easy_install -ihttp://www.turbogears.org/2.0/downloads/1.9.7b1/index > > simplejson FormEncode Genshi repoze.who Babel decorator repoze.tm2 > > Transaction zope.interface BytecodeAssembler DecoratorTools AddOns > > Extremes > > > This are the versions that need to be upgraded, for webhelpers > > required is 0.6.1 but current 0.6.3. > > > webOb0.9.2 --- 0.9.3 > > Mako 0.2 --- 0.2.2 > > WebHelpers 0.6dev-20080613 -- 0.6.1 (0.6.3) > > Routes 1.9 --- 1.10.1 > > > I also notice the following: > > > - it is still pulling tg.ext.repoze.who > > > it is also pulling the following "dev packages" > > > PasteScript-1.6.4dev_r7555-py2.5.egg > > DBSprockets-0.5dev_r411-py2.5.egg > > ToscaWidgets-0.9.5dev_20081026-py2.5.egg (what happend to 0.9.4?) > > PEAK_Rules-0.5a1.dev_r2562-py2.5.egg > > repoze.tm2 1.0a3 > > > shouldn't we bug upstream for a release? after all this is a mayor TG > > milestone. I know DBSprockets and TW are easy as they are closer to > > TG, how about the other three? > > > What is the status of sqlalchemy-migrate? > > last I heard it didn't support 0.5, although I just googled and found > > thishttp://groups.google.com/group/migrate-users/browse_thread/thread/e98... > > and thishttp://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/source/detail?r=449 > > > so shall we use their trunk (449)? pin down at 0.4 or add a warning > > for it? I vote for the last one, as migrate isn't a critical part of > > TG but a nice addition. > > -- > Mark Ramm-Christensen > email: mark at compoundthinking dot com > blog:www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
