I have just verified that:

easy_install -i http://www.turbogears.org/2.0/downloads/1.9.7b1/index
tg.devtools

works on python 2.5 and 2.6

That's right folks, 2.6.  Welcome to 2008.

cheers.
-chris

On Oct 28, 11:11 pm, percious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nice work.  it all works smashingly now.
>
> cheers.
> -chris
>
> On Oct 28, 11:05 pm, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, so I've added beautiful soup, webtest, and upgraded the
> > dependencies below.   And a quick test on my mac shows that for some
> > reason virtualenv is not respecting the --no-site-packages options on
> > my machine.
>
> > So, I used a ubuntu VMWare image to test this install and everything
> > seems to have worked this time.
>
> > I also updated some stuff so that my local only tests that were broken
> > aren't in the release any more.   So, hopefully this is all good now..
>
> > --Mark Ramm
>
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Derick Eisenhardt
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> Finally got it to work!
>
> > > This method worked for me.
>
> > > just a  little note, you can chain this into the same line:
> > > easy_install -ihttp://www.turbogears.org/2.0/downloads/1.9.7b1/index
> > > simplejson FormEncode Genshi repoze.who Babel decorator repoze.tm2
> > > Transaction zope.interface BytecodeAssembler DecoratorTools AddOns
> > > Extremes
>
> > > This are the versions that need to be upgraded, for webhelpers
> > > required is 0.6.1 but current 0.6.3.
>
> > > webOb0.9.2 --- 0.9.3
> > > Mako 0.2 --- 0.2.2
> > > WebHelpers 0.6dev-20080613 -- 0.6.1 (0.6.3)
> > > Routes 1.9 --- 1.10.1
>
> > > I also notice the following:
>
> > > - it is still pulling tg.ext.repoze.who
>
> > > it is also pulling the following "dev packages"
>
> > > PasteScript-1.6.4dev_r7555-py2.5.egg
> > > DBSprockets-0.5dev_r411-py2.5.egg
> > > ToscaWidgets-0.9.5dev_20081026-py2.5.egg (what happend to 0.9.4?)
> > > PEAK_Rules-0.5a1.dev_r2562-py2.5.egg
> > > repoze.tm2 1.0a3
>
> > > shouldn't we bug upstream for a release? after all this is a mayor TG
> > > milestone. I know DBSprockets and TW are easy as they are closer to
> > > TG, how about the other three?
>
> > > What is the status of sqlalchemy-migrate?
> > > last I heard it didn't support 0.5, although I just googled and found
> > > thishttp://groups.google.com/group/migrate-users/browse_thread/thread/e98...
> > > and thishttp://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/source/detail?r=449
>
> > > so shall we use their trunk (449)? pin down at 0.4 or add a warning
> > > for it? I vote for the last one, as migrate isn't a critical part of
> > > TG but a nice addition.
>
> > --
> > Mark Ramm-Christensen
> > email: mark at compoundthinking dot com
> > blog:www.compoundthinking.com/blog
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to