On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote:
> My idea was to keep the two repos in sync until things have settled (and > there should not be much going on until then) so we won't create confusion > if we move another time. My though was that if we don't use the tracker at > SF anyway, we should rather move the repos to github. > I've found that "should not" somehow translates to an open invitation for something to happen. The sooner we turn "should not" into "can not", the better. > But if you think that creates even more confusion, go ahead. The most > important point is that we create a stable project infrastructure soon, so > we can work on the project itself again. > Agreed. Sadly, SF did not reply on my ticket at all today, so I've started harassing tonight, though I expect I won't be able to get any information until tomorrow sometime. In the meantime, since I can't do a great deal else, I'm now focusing on learning git. I'll admit that it seems powerful. Also quite daunting. We'll see what comes of it for me. Hopefully, by end of week, I'll be able to work on either (or both) the tracker migration for TG2 and/or the docs migration. -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
