First, allow me to say this: I'm participating minimally in this discussion, and that's deliberate. It's not like the rest of this past week where I've been under a crushing work load and therefore been unavailable. I want to get community opinion first and foremost.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Can't we just provide support for Kajiki as an option without dropping > support for Python 2.4? Genshi would continue to be the default because it's > fully backward compatible and runs everywhere. > This option didn't even cross my mind. The reason it didn't is because it violates another goal: 100% testing coverage. To test that Kajiki works, we have to test it. In order to test it, we have to render a page. On Python 2.4, we can't do that. So, due to my goals, I can't accept that option. -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] My LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaeljpedersen Twitter: pedersentg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
