On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote:
> In my opinion we do not need to require 100% coverage with Py 2.4 if there > is already 100% coverage with Py > 2.4 and all tests except for the Kajiki > option do run with Py 2.4. > I agree in principle, at least, but we do have a problem: We already have Kajiki in our tests. The failure occurs as soon as you even try to easy_install, and somewhere in the chain we have a dependency on Kajiki. The end result is that, when running our tests on Python 2.4, the system tries to easy_install Kajiki, fails, and *no* tests get run. We have no feedback on the setup when we do this. > If we drop Py 2.4 support then we should do it in the next minor release, > i.e. TG 2.2. TG 2.1.x bugfix releases should continue to work with Py 2.4, > but maybe we can add a deprecation warning. > I'm still torn. One or the other is going to have to give, and I don't like either of them. Either 2.4 support has to be labelled as "Should work, but no guarantees since we can't even run our automated test suite" or we have to drop something. If there's another option, I'd very much like to hear it. Really. Please. -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] My LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaeljpedersen Twitter: pedersentg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
