On 1/18/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might hold off on that for the moment. I'd really like to think > about how stateful widgets would work, and there might be some > breaking changes as a result. (I don't *want* to make breaking changes > per se, but too many people get tripped up by this.)
If we're doing breaking changes, let me know how we're handling the declarative issue in #114. If we're going to do widgetmeta or name the fields with a leading underscore, that will be a breaking change, which is why I haven't done it.
