Jorge Godoy wrote: > "Michele Cella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > IMHO yes, I also think that support for any deprecated feature should > > be removed at some point (for example at 1.1, after you advised this > > with deprecation warnings during 1.0) or you will have to support a lot > > I believe that since it didn't exist in TG 0.8 and there's no TG 0.9, all > people using it are the ones using SVN. Deprecate in 0.9 (wow! we're > deprecating alpha software!) and remove in 0.9.1 ;-) People who start with > 0.9 should use the correct form since the very beginning.
Yes, you're right is also my own opinion but I expressed it more softly. :D Deprecating something that never went out of svn sounds strange but giving the time to people who followed svn to switch is also important, so the 0.9 -> 0.9.1 plan sounds good. I also agree that TG should try to suggest only one and correct way of doing something (example: @validate instead of @expose). Ciao Michele
