Karl Guertin wrote: > On 2/21/06, Richard (koorb) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All honest comments are welcome. Take a look at it without CSS too, I > > would very much appreciate critique on accessibility, usability, and > > standards-compliance. (heres looking at you nerkles!) > > What was wrong with the design everybody agreed on? Why did the site > have to get web 2.0 bandwagon-ified? > > I've got plenty of issues with this design, but I'd like to get those > out of the way first.
I agree with Karl, I think the old (but new) design that sits on newdocs/preview is better and more attractive, it's almost perfect from my POV, my only glitches with it are: - the download sibebar that should be fixed - a smaller header for content pages I also really like: - the whole first page that's gives a nice first impression (but I would like to see a screencast link here and the 3-step motto we talked about some times ago) - the colorscheme (blue, light blue, yellow, light orange) >From the new one, that's still quite nice by the way, I don't like colors like violet and red and it's not so attractive. Keep up the great work, but I felt in love with the one in newdocs! ;-) Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
