On 3/1/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/1/06, Gerhard Häring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No flamewar intended, but if TurboGears goes GPL (unlikely, I know), I > > will move elsewhere. > > That will never happen.
If it did, I would definitely have to drop TurboGears. The GPL mandates that any software released with GPL code must be GPL. But the US government cannot release GPL software (or any other license); it must release public domain. But public domain is incompatible with the GPL. So I'd have to drop TurboGears for my current project. As for Kid et al having MIT-like licenses, all "MIT" licenses are MIT-like. They can't be strictly MIT because the owner is not the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] address is semi-reliable) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
