To get back to my original question, it sounds like using TG with
sqlalchemy is a ways off...
right now yes your right, unless you want contribute with the code as you build your project.
You have too keep in mind that too many unstable factors are in the middle.
first sa0.2 itself has less then a month out.
then TG support was made for 0.1 and need to be redo.
then you have the design issue of making TG compatible with 0.1 AND 0.2 or leave 0.1 unsupported.
and at last you have the TG unstability itself, although many people have been using 0.9x and saying it's stable.... much like grub :)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy support ready to use? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy support ready to use... Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy support ready to use... Kevin Dangoor
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy support ready to... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy support read... Jorge Godoy
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy support ... Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy sup... Jorge Godoy
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalchemy... Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalc... Jorge Godoy
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalc... Arnar Birgisson
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalc... Kevin Dangoor
- [TurboGears] Re: Is sqlalc... Arnar Birgisson

