Hi there, I've been looking at coding SA 0.2 support in TG whenever I can (which hasn't been much lately). I sent Godoy patches for removing ActiveMapper from the 0.1 code some time ago.
If one uses the threadlocal mod in 0.2, going from 0.1 to 0.2 is dead-easy. I could possibly post a patch for that today or tomorrow. However, I've been struggling with the descision if that mod is appropriate in a web-application. Mabey we should allocate a session object to each request and use that instead. Has anyone thought about this? Arnar On 6/8/06, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Em Quarta 07 Junho 2006 21:23, Jorge Vargas escreveu: > > > > didn't I just did? :p make a tar and shot me an email. > > I'm slooooooooooooooow today... :-) Just kidding, I was just asking for > confirmation. I'll send it to you. > > > I though you where able to code support for non existing software .... you > > have disapointed me. > > C'mon... My crystal ball is broken. :-) And yes, as every IT guy I had no > backup for it... ;-) > > > well it the project was reject we should form a group of people that will > > manage a branch for this. > > > > anyone interested? > > Just after getting money to live... :-( > > -- > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
