On Jan 25, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> > Alberto Valverde, el 25 de enero a las 14:45 me escribiste: >> Inheritance support in SQLAlchemy rocks IMO :) > > I couldn't make relations between inherited classes work. The > design/idea > rocks, the current status, I'm not so sure... Well, I have no problem with them (though I must admit I had to fight it hard at the beginning). Probably the folks at SA's ML could help you there. > >> as you have said, SA lacks a mature wrapper layer which does some >> meta-programming to make it's syntax sweeter. ActiveMapper and >> TurboEntity are two contestants for this niche that might actually >> merge IIRC. > > Yes, but that wasn't my worst problem. The problem was it won't work. > >>> And I think TG don't have to switch to SA before it: >>> 1) Support inheritance properly. >> >> As I've said, it does. It just needs lack some candy-wrapper to make >> it sweeter. > > No, I've tried the good-old-explicit way. It has problems when using > relations. When I have some time I promess to isolate the problems and > post them to SA list. You might be surprised...I was going to send a test-case to the SA ML when I first tried SA because I couldn't get inheritance working in an app and trying to isolate the problem with SA's docs side-by-side actually helped me pin-point what *I* was doing wrong... :) Alberto --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
