OK
What if I wanted to start a new project, would it be best to wait to
TG2.0?
Or use some hybrid approach?

On Jul 31, 3:04 pm, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two quick responses:
>
> 1) Turbogears is not for everybody.
>
> 2) Elixir is not required, and it adds to SQLAlchemy only what
> SQLObject already had included -- and active record style development
> environment.
>
> I'm very aware that the TurboGears install process has become
> encumbered with too many requirements, and we're hoping to reduce both
> the TG2 codebase itself, and the number of installation requirements
> in TG2.   However, there's a  balance to be found, as we are very much
> in favor of code/library reuse, and that philosophy isn't likely to
> change.
>
> As for deployment, I think you'll find that high load web servers have
> trouble with mod-python due to the fact that you end up running so
> many python interpreters.  So the separate-process python web server
> is not really a bad model.   But, if you really want mod_python
> integration you can use a WSGI bridge:
>
> http://docs.pythonweb.org/display/pylonscookbook/Production+deploymen...
>
> Hopefully, mod_wsgi will be more widely deployed in the future (now
> that it's approaching a 1.0 release) and it will be another good
> deployment option for apache users.
>
> --Mark Ramm
>
> On 7/31/07, johnbrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > TG started out as a good idea  as it looked like an easy way to get
> > into Ajax, but I now think it is getting out of hand - talk about
> > trying to hit a moving target!
> > To me it looks as if it is trying to see how many layers of software
> > it can pile on top of each other before it falls over.
> > Having Elixir on top of SQLAchemy which sits on top of  the database
> > handlers is, IMHO,  overkill.
> > And then you have all the complications of trying to get the
> > apllication to run behind  a webserver such as Apache.  Why not just
> > use modpython directly?  If find that approach works fine.
> > Sorry, I must be missing something, all I want is a simple way to use
> > Ajax without all the complications of having to download nearly every
> > bit of software that has been written in Python
>
> > John Bradbury
>
> > On 28 Jul, 04:39, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > As I understand it, TG will drop CherryPy, and adopt Pylons. Since
> > > > both frameworks are stacks of other python components, I am not sure
> > > > if I see the point.
>
> > > > A strength of both tg, and pylons, is that you can easialy swap out
> > > > different compents, right?  So why not just put together whatever
> > > > components you want?
>
> > > TurboGears will be what it has always been, a stack of best of breed
> > > python components, wired together to provide a web experience that
> > > gets you started quickly, and provides a robust web development
> > > environment.   TurboGears 2 will provide Pylons with a set of standard
> > > components, a new controller publishing API that is easier to get
> > > started with than Routes, a bunch of additional rapid web development
> > > tools, and a lot more developer attention.
>
> > > Pylons provides a robust WSGI stack, and a clean way to reimplement
> > > the TurboGears API in relatively little code.   And since Pylons has a
> > > goal of being a framework that maximizes developer choices, people
> > > have been pushing Ben and the rest of the pylons dev's to make a well
> > > documented set of defaults, and to make the framework a bit easier for
> > > new developers to learn.
>
> > > In the new TurboGears+Pylons working together world, we're both able
> > > to focus on the things that have made our individual frameworks
> > > successfull in the past, and share development effort on lots and lots
> > > of things.
>
> > > So do answer your point, I think that working together with the Pylons
> > > folks benefits everybody in both user communities, and helps to
> > > strengthen both frameworks.
>
> > > --Mark Ramm
>
> --
> Mark Ramm-Christensen
> email: mark at compoundthinking dot com
> blog:www.compoundthinking.com/blog


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to