johnbraduk ha scritto: > People never seem to learn that "if it ain't broke don't fix it". > John >
With all due respect to Ian Bicking, SQLObject 2.0 is "broken" in some way, or we would already have a 2.0 release: http://blog.ianbicking.org/sqlobject-2.html This is without going deep in the architectural limits of the ORM. There would be much to say. By the way, you will be able to keep using SQLObject it with TurboGears 1.1 and 2.0. So, I miss the point of your post.. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
