> This ticket is closed and obsolete. yes is closed, and because this i've said "some months ago" > Yes, TurboGears 1.0.x is still based on CherryPy 2.2 and won't work with > CherryPy 3. I was talking about 1.1
> It seems that you have not been following the latest developments in > TurboGears land very closely lately. Here are some pointers to get you > started on reading up on the status of TG today: yes I am folowing the last developments, but some documentation make people beleave that cp3 will be used.... for sample, http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/FileUploadProgressBar here have some reference about cp3 will be used around 2.0, and I know 2.0 will be based on pylons so I beleave that cp3 will be done at 1.1, this doc of course is no marked as official, but is there and now seems to be outdated. here have too some reference saying "TurboGears does not use yet" refering to CP3. http://docs.turbogears.org/FAQ?highlight=%28cp3%29 this I remember found yesterday, but propably have more. > * Unless somebody wants to have another try at porting TG 1.1 to CP 3. > But that would basically mean forking TG 1.1 and TG 2. for now, thank you for fast reply... thanks too for Ted and Florent... Att, Alexandre --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
