Florent Aide wrote:

>   - Second the communication on where the 1.0 and 1.1 branches are
> going as been quite feeble (to say the least) and this is my own
> fault. I'll need to amend my ways. I promise I'll try to find time on
> new year's eve to communicate more on the planning, the milestones and
> the planned features.
>   

I reckon that with TG 1.1 we must dispose of the SQLAlchemy implicit 
session+transaction management.

If I am right, people will have to add calls to save(), flush(), 
commit() and rollback() in controllers' code.

While I like the flexibility, I see a potential for omission bugs in 
apps converted to explicit transactions, so a few guidelines/best 
practices would be appreciated.

tnx

-- 
This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is strictly confidential and for use only 
by intended recipient(s).  Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by 
any other person is strictly prohibited. The content of this e-mail does not 
constitute a commitment by the Company except where provided for in a written 
agreement between this e-mail addressee and the Company.
If you are not an intended recipient(s), please notify the sender promptly and 
destroy this message and its attachments without reading or saving it in any 
manner.
Any non authorized use of the content of this message constitutes a violation 
of the obligation to abstain from learning of the correspondence among other 
subjects, except for more serious offence, and exposes the person responsible 
to the relevant consequences.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to