Michael Hipp wrote: > I want to use: > > SQLAlchemy and Elixir > jQuery (I think) > > Appears I would be targeting TG 1.1 or 2. Are they stable enough > for use?
TG 1.1 is likely more stable than TG 2.0, but TG 2.0 is built on top of some pretty rock-solid tools. I'd call it a push. What you'll be dealing with in 2.0 is a moving target, so I'd probably encourage you to go with 1.1, unless you are starving for some of the things in 2.0 (which you probably aren't). > How do I learn TG2? I wanted to buy the book but fear much would > be N/A due to the big changes in components. Most all the docs > seem to be for the 1.0 version. You dig into the code and play :) Ask questions here on the mailing list. There is no comprehensive documentation, as far as I know, just yet. If you feel that documentation is a huge need, I'd encourage you to go with TG 1.1 or Pylons. > I like Django's simple templating system. And it looks like Jinga > might be its closest relative. (I just can't get warm to the heavy > XMLish and Python-code-in-the-markup style of Genshi and Kid. No > offense.) How hard would it be to use Jinga instead of Genshi? Its easy to use alternate template systems. I'd encourage you to take a close look at Mako, which is blazing fast, and has lots of great features. > How about using jQuery instead of Mochikit. This is a matter of taste. I use ExtJS, but have used both JQuery and MochiKit in the past. You can't really lose, as they all are excellent, but I've moved away from MochiKit, since it hasn't really seen much progress in ages. Good luck. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
