....
> It's clear that the tg team can not make the transition from sqlobject
> to sqlalchemy any easier, so I'm definitely not arguing for that. What
> I'm saying is that if many users are in the same boat (transition to
> 2.x from 1.x would be easy from a framework point of view, but hard
> from an ORM point of view because of the sqlobject - sqlalchemy
> transition) then perhaps not so much emphasis needs to go into
> creating stepping stones such as 1.1 and 1.5. But maybe many other
> users are not ORM limited, they perhaps really need stepping stones
> for the framework itself.
>

I agree with you.
I do not see the value in the 1.1 and 1.5 branches, especially
since the 2.0 release will be out before them (!).

In my case, I probably have more invested in Kid templates than
SQLObject, but they are both a concern.  All the docs and examples
seem to be for Genshi, so I do not know if sticking with Kid templates
is a such a viable option.  Extensive use of TG1 identity is another
issue.

I am still planning to use TG2 when it is ready,
even though it will be a lot of 2 steps back and
1 step forward to do it.  IMO, TG is the best
WEB-dev platform available, so it is worth it.

IMO, ready is:
  - production code release
  - good docs on all aspects of TG1 to TG2 transition
  - good docs on new TG2 features
  - complete tg-admin toolbox support, especially
    widget browser for ToscaWidgets
  - ability to co-exist with TG1 without virtualenv

Wishlist:
  - subversion support
  - more recipes
  - more widgets
  - identity-aware menu system

I am not saying the docs are not good now.
They are good, but I find the recipe doc format easier to use.


> Cheers,
> Daniel

Andy

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to