>> A show-stopper would be that TG2 uses by default the repoze.what SQL and >> quickstart plugins, which only support SQLAlchemy. So supporting SO in TG2 >> would also mean porting both plugins to SO. >> > > Also I don't think this should belong to the core. it should live in > tgext.sqlobject, and hook into tg2 to replace the modules.
Why do you think so? If integration of sqlobject is achievable I'd say SO and SA are on the same footing, just as was the case with tg1. Why should SA be favored? I'm building on the assumption that support for sqlobject is doable in a clean and elegant way. I'm not saying it's easy (in fact, until today I thought it will never be done), but supposing that the code is there, in that case, why do you think SA should be singled out? Cheers, Daniel -- Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
