There is a toolbox2 entry point in tg.devtools, and I'm somewhat interested in seeing it continue to live. I mean it's very little code, and pretty much all the interesting stuff happens in the tools. And if you've got something with a tg web interface it's pretty easy to turn it into a toolbox tool, so it's not that much overhead.
And while it's not terribly useful for advanced users, the tools are nice for beginners, and are good marketing material. --Mark On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Jorge Vargas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, I think it is important that we decide if we are going to have > a toolbox or not for TG2. > > We have most of the components (only model designer is missing) but I > want to know of people think it's a good idea or not. > > IMO the toolbox should be replaced by a documentation entry telling > people which component was replaced by which and be done with it. > Toolbox is an unnecessary layer of abstraction and an extra piece of > code to maintain. That said I have seen many people migrating from 1.x > on IRC asking "where is the toolbox?" > > I have created a ticket for the proper +1/-1, > http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/2164 and lets keep discussion on the > list. > > > > -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
