Thanks good to ear about it, although I firmly believe offering "incomplete" features is a potential bug, however, Jinja2 being an accessory part of TurboGears2 (really how many users are there?) is not that important.
As for development, should I start working on my patch from SVN or will Git on SF.net be the new way? Kind regards, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela On Mar 13, 9:21 pm, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Would there be a chance of adding something like this to Turbogears > > for next revision?, I'm quite sure I could do a patch for it if people > > want it. > > The next revision? I would say likely not, though this is not as bad as it > sounds. Right now, we're transferring our issue tracker, and getting things > working on a new server, etc. Our next releases are 2.0.4 and 2.1.1. These > are meant to be purely bugfix releases, with no new features. > > For the 2.2.0 release? Definitely I could get behind that. Possibly even for > 2.1.2. The major things to do for your patch would be to focus on getting > the testing coverage to 100% for your patch, and getting docs written for it > so that others can use it. Once we can see all of that, I'd be happy to > include it. > > -- > Michael J. Pedersen > My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 > Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
