On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela < [email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks good to ear about it, although I firmly believe offering > "incomplete" features is a potential bug, however, Jinja2 being an > accessory part of TurboGears2 (really how many users are there?) is > not that important. > Well, from the perspective of the TG core, the feature is mostly complete. The biggest failing is that the docs are not thorough (or, if they are, they're not easy to find, even for me). Jinja functions in the same way as Mako and Genshi, which are the two big uses, and provides the same basic featuresets. So, from our perspective, Jinja is working properly. It could probably do more, but that is adding features, definitely. As for how many users? Well, we might be small in comparison to some other toolkits out there, but we did have 8000 visits to our 2.x docs alone over the past 30 days. That's not too shabby, I don't think. > As for development, should I start working on my patch from SVN or > will Git on SF.net be the new way? > Short answer: https://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/home/ contains git repositories for all the pieces. Depending on how much you want to see, you could even update the devtools to support Jinja right out of the box. Long answer: SVN is used by TG1, and Git is used by TG2. So, both of them are relevant, just for different pieces. > Kind regards, > Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela > > On Mar 13, 9:21 pm, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Would there be a chance of adding something like this to Turbogears > > > for next revision?, I'm quite sure I could do a patch for it if people > > > want it. > > > > The next revision? I would say likely not, though this is not as bad as > it > > sounds. Right now, we're transferring our issue tracker, and getting > things > > working on a new server, etc. Our next releases are 2.0.4 and 2.1.1. > These > > are meant to be purely bugfix releases, with no new features. > > > > For the 2.2.0 release? Definitely I could get behind that. Possibly even > for > > 2.1.2. The major things to do for your patch would be to focus on getting > > the testing coverage to 100% for your patch, and getting docs written for > it > > so that others can use it. Once we can see all of that, I'd be happy to > > include it. > > > > -- > > Michael J. Pedersen > > My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, > AIM/pedermj022171 > > Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en. > > -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
