Hi Again, On 06.01.2015 15:31, lebouquetin wrote:
> I believe that TG as niche product should target professionnal > application and administration interfaces which need "standard" features > (like, for example OAuth or LDAP authentication, Maybe web services for > interaction with other applications, mail notifications > out-of-the-box... etc > > These parts are not working or not documented - and currently the main > issue I face is about getting documentation and/or help. >From my own experience, I can not really agree to that observation. Especially for professional developers with specific and advanced requirements, I think that in most cases, reading and understanding the code is better than relying on some documentation. Isn't that one of the great things about programming Python that you actually can read the source of everything and not need to workaround odd behaviour of some JARs that have been thrown your way? For me, diving into the source code of TG2 and the dependant projects (tgext.*, sprox, TW2, ...) has always helped at least to some degree. Best wishes, Moritz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
