Le mardi 6 janvier 2015 18:26:37 UTC+1, Moritz Schlarb a écrit : > > Hi Again, > > On 06.01.2015 15:31, lebouquetin wrote: > > > I believe that TG as niche product should target professionnal > > application and administration interfaces which need "standard" features > > (like, for example OAuth or LDAP authentication, Maybe web services for > > interaction with other applications, mail notifications > > out-of-the-box... etc > > > > These parts are not working or not documented - and currently the main > > issue I face is about getting documentation and/or help. > > From my own experience, I can not really agree to that observation. > > Especially for professional developers with specific and advanced > requirements, I think that in most cases, reading and understanding the > code is better than relying on some documentation. >
Sometimes it's fine, sometimes it's not. For example, when methods are added dynamically, it's really a pain to investiguate because, before to read and understand the code, you need to know which code to read. When you have a lot of polymorphism and dynamic behavior, it's even quite difficult. For the problem I'm speaking about - LDAP, there is no official status : old documentation has disappeared (is it deliberate or is it an error ?) some blog post say "here is how to work with LDAP", a thread is giving a status like "it should work, except is some cases"... this is quite diffuse information. I agree that if you know exactly what you want to do, and how it should work, reading the code is enough. But if you have at least a small piece of stuff to learn, it become really hard. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
