On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:09:27AM -0800, lebouquetin wrote: > * do not find documentation about what I'd like to do (which is > possible) The documentation is way better but yes there are assumptions made. The problem also is sometimes its not TG2 documentation that is lacking but the associated projects.
> There are very few people reading the mailing list and I have several > questions with no reply at all. A lot of those for me are, because I don't know the answer. > What about you ? Who is reading this ML ? Who is still working with TG ? > Is there any reason to still work with it (I know that Alessandro is doing > a great job, this is not my point, but using open source need a community > and I feel like there is no TG2 community anymore). I'm working with TG for one of my personal projects (the closest I get to coding in my day job would be an excel macro). It's a network management system called RNMS. The backend is largely done and the frontend.. well its there. I got involved in TG because the precusor project, JFFNMS was written in PHP, then I was going to look at CakePHP then I looked at other frameworks and came across TG2 which seemed to fit the bill. The more i use TG, the happier I am with the decision, but it would be good to have a more vibrant community. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
