In our POMs, we have the following dependency:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.emf</groupId>
<artifactId>commonj-sdo</artifactId>
<version>2.1.0</version>
</dependency>
So does 2.1.0 refer to the eclipse version, not the "spec" jar? Is
there an "independent" (i.e. impl neutral) SDO jar?
Jim
On Feb 14, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Jim,
The latest version of the SDO spec is 2.0.1 ... but the java
interfaces
are unchanged, so the latest version is still 2.0, which is what is
in the
repository under spec/sdo.
It looks like .../pojo/SDOType is based on the SDO 1.0 version of
Type, so
it would need to be moved up to 2.0 - or replaced with the SDO Type
implementation class from the SDO project.
Frank.
Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/14/2006 11:23:13 AM:
Looks like you need to point to SDO 2.1.0, not 2.0, since the
signature is different. This raises a question of which is "correct",
i.e. which version we are targeting? Could one of the people working
on SDO comment and I can change the impl if required?
Jim
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:39 AM, ant elder wrote:
Trying to get Tuscany setup in eclipse properly and I'm getting
compile
errors in org.apache.tuscany.model.assembly.pojo.SDOType as it
doesn't
implement all the methods that are in commonj.sdo.Type from SVN.
See:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/spec/sdo/src/
main/java/commonj/sdo/Type.java
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/model/
src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/model/assembly/pojo/SDOType.java
Am i doing this wrong, should the the eclipse project for model not
be using
the project for spec.sdo?
...ant
