O.K. I assumed 2.1.0 referred to the SDO version (2.1.0 eclipse impl
~ SDO 1.0). It seems like the issue of an impl-neutral jar should be
raised with the spec group since this is bound to crop up elsewhere.
Jim
On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
In our POMs, we have the following dependency:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.emf</groupId>
<artifactId>commonj-sdo</artifactId>
<version>2.1.0</version>
</dependency>
So does 2.1.0 refer to the eclipse version, not the "spec" jar?
Yes. This is the SDO1 API.
Is there an "independent" (i.e. impl neutral) SDO jar?
Due to issues with the SDO spec, no. However, I made some changes
to our
version of the SDO2 spec jar (the one in spec/sdo) to allow multiple
implementations to share it. It's a "vendor" extension that allows
other
vendors to use our implementation :-)
I am in the process of converting the SCA code over to using our SDO2
implementation rather then the SDO1 one from Eclipse. Until this is
done
we need to continue using the SDO1 APIs to match the SDO1
implementation.
If someone would like to chip in, any assistance would be appreciated.
--
Jeremy
