On 7/6/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Simon Nash wrote:

All ideas that Sebastien has proposed are being considered - we had a
long discussion on these very things on IRC this morning. The main
questions being asked about his proposal are "what is the benefit of
starting over?" and "why can we not start with what we already have
in the sandbox?" One of the problems here is that there are no clear
answers to them.

...

We made a start this morning with a fairly long discussion on IRC
about which code to use. Several people said that they had found the
sandbox code clearer than M1 and wanted to know from Sebastien why he
thought we had to start over (I paraphrase). It's a reasonable
question to ask; it's unreasonable for it to continue to go unanswered.

.. not having been on IRC, you can add me to the list of folks who
found the sandbox code more manageable and easier to get involved
with.  I'm not fundamentally opposed to the idea that we might "start
over", but I certainly don't see a documented/well-discussed technical
case justifying that at this point.

k

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to