+1, to both the proposal and Raymond's comments
--
Jeremy
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Here's my non-binding vote: +1.
I fully agree that we're at a cirtical point to make the direction
clear and move forward quickly. Moving Chianti into trunk will
definitely help us set the new common base as we don't see other
appealing alternatives. I also would like to advocate that the move
is NOT a "STOP" sign to constructive technical discussions.
Let's leave all the past behind and work together to build an
innovative, open-minded and collaborative community for the success
of Tuscany.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscdev" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: Subject: [VOTE] promote Chianti revolution to main trunk
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base.
I've
held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want
to add any more fuel to the fire. I now feel I have to speak
up: to
be honest about this, I was really disheartened that it has
came to
pass that we as a community so soon moved to having to fall
back on "The Rules for Revolutionaries". While this seems to be
acceptable
path for a Apache project, I don't feel that makes right for
Tuscany. I think there is a fundamental difference in the
stages of
projects that followed that route and the stage that Tuscany
currently is at and survived as a project.. Many of these
projects
were fairly mature, they had a much larger pool of core developers
to draw on both sides, they had a much larger user base, and
for the
most part they were based on mature specifications. I agree
that in
some stages in the life time of a project a revolution is
desperately needed to bring about innovation. I don't think
this is
the case for Tuscany, I honestly don't think Tuscany is at the
stage where it can quite honestly survive such a split and still
gain traction in gaining commiters and users.
I'd really like to request that we as a community once again focus
not as much on the technology which both branches have merit, but
consider the Tuscany project as a whole will be better served
if we
make a decision on which will be the future today. Thus I'm
requesting as has been asked before if we can't take a vote on one
and once again move forward together as one.
Specifcly:
I would like to propose that we make the chanti tree the main
trunk
and turn the current trunk into a maintainance branch. The chianti
code would be moved to tuscany/java and would be the main
development tree moving forward; the existing trunk would be moved
to branches/M1. Please vote if you agree with this proposal - as a
policy vote, at least 3 +1s and more +1's than -1's would be
needed
to do this
This is my +1 for this.
Thanks
Rick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
