One of the reasons I started this thread was to try to get a common understanding about what everyone expects is required to become a Tuscany committer. Its hard to publicly say you think someone isn't ready yet, even on the private list, so a common understanding would mean nominations would more likely get unanimous approval. If a nomination is being discussed on the private list how do we know when its ok to call a public vote on the dev list? Are just a few positive responses enough? Are lots of positive responses required? Or just no negative ones? Or does there need to be at least positive responses from all the committers active in that area? I think maybe the latter of those for now while there's still not so many of us, but what do others think?
...ant On 7/6/06, Jeremy Boynes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, > > I guess I can understand how to get credits for the "committer" > status. > > As a contributor, I would like to see a well-defined measurable > path which I can see how I make progresses toward the goal. It > leads two questions: > > 1) How many points do we need to gain to become a committer? > 2) How do we measure the contributions? Is it just an impression or > sense from existing committers or do we run some statistics once a > while? > It's about trust so hard-facts don't tell all the story - it really is about what the existing committers think. -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
