Venkat,
+1 from me. This seems exactly right.
Simon
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I'd prefer to have business samples under 'samples' itself. I perceive
that
technology samples will go to the respective project directories and all
others are to demonstrate the cool things of combining containers,
transports - the integration story and they would all get under samples
i.e.
samples/BigBang, samples/SupplyChain .. and so on.
- Venkat
On 10/7/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I was thinking that the technology type samples would be the ones
that are now moved further down into the folder hierarchy so the only
thing
left up at the top would be the business samples so there wasn't the need
for the two folders 'samples' and 'sampleapps' so sampleapps might as
well
just be renamed to samples to keep everything consistent.
Please anyone say if they disagree with that. I'd also still like to hear
comments or suggestions on all this from others who've expressed an
interest
in the samples in the past before I make the changes - Jim , Rick,
Simon?
...ant
On 10/6/06, Brent Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Previously we had discussed having a "sampleapps" directory to
> distinguish "business samples" from technology samples.[1] Do we want
> to continue this distinction?
>
> Brent
>
>
> [1] -
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01812.html
>
> On 10/6/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok I think we're getting some agreement but I'd like to be clear
> everyone
> > agrees and is happy before I make any changes. Sounds like for things
> like
> > the Groovy/JavaScript/etc helloworld and calculator type samples they
> would
> > go with the extension, I'm guessing samples that use just sca and
java
> would
> > go in an sca/samples directory. Samples that use multiple extensions
but
> > still just SCA would also go in the sca/samples directory, and
there'd
> be a
> > top level samples directory for things like bigbank that use
> sca/sdo/das.
> >
> > So:
> >
> > samples/bingbank
> > das/samples/companyweb
> > sca/samples/calculator
> > sca/services/containers/container.javascript/src/samples/calculator
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 10/5/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Oct 5, 2006, at 7:14 AM, ant elder wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 10/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I think organizing the samples like this is a good idea. I'd
> suggest
> > > >> going one step further and place each sample with the
> implementation
> > > >> of the service that it is illustrating. That way it becomes much
> > > >> easier to tag/release each module on its own.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure I follow "place each sample with the implementation
of
> > > > the
> > > > service that it is illustrating" , do you mean something like:
> > > >
> > > > samples/helloworld/java
> > > > samples/helloworld/javascript
> > > > samples/calculator/java
> > > > samples/calculator/javascript
> > > >
> > > > Or do you mean include them with the extension so the JavaScript
> > > > folder
> > > > would include samples/helloworld and samples/calculator? I didn't
> > > > think Jim
> > > > liked this way, from the previous thread - "In other words, each
> > > > sample
> > > > project should not be a sibling to the project containing
extension
> > > > code but
> > > > should go under a samples folder in separate projects".
> > > I was thinking samples for particular extensions would go under the
> > > particular extension's directory. For samples that used multiple
> > > extensions, they would go under the master samples folder. I liked
> > > what was done with the calculator where stuff is shared between
> > > projects (component reuse) so if that structuring won't work for
re-
> > > use I would be fine with what Ant just outlined. My preference,
> > > though, would be to group samples with individual extensions.
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ...ant
> > >
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Simon C Nash IBM Distinguished Engineer
Hursley Park, Winchester, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
