Jim Marino wrote:
<cut>...</cut>
Tuscany SCA allows services to be implemented in variety of
languages such as Java, JavaScript and C++. Tuscany SCA runtime is
implemented in Java and C++ and can easily be extended to support
any communication transport, qualities of service or programming
model and can be used in conjunction with other technologies such
as Spring, Axis and Celtix.
[JFM the above sentence combines two separate things. I would re-
word as:
There are Java and C++ SCA runtimes that support services
implemented in variety of languages such as Java, JavaScript and C
++. Both runtimes and can easily be extended to support additional
communication transports, qualities of service or programming
models. In addition, they can be used in conjunction with other
technologies such as Spring, Axis and Celtix.]
Today we have two separate runtimes for Java and C++. I'd like to
see us
move towards what Venkat is describing, i.e., an integrated runtime that
supports components written in Java, C++ and other languages.
It depends on what you mean by "integrated". For me "federated" may be
a way to describe it as the runtime architectures are fairly distinct
as well as the capabilities of the two implementations.
"Federated" would be a good first step. There could be further steps
beyond this into "integrated" territory, though I suspect that these
terms may have different interpretations for different people. I'd
like to think this through a bit more and come back with some thoughts
on how this could work (whatever we call it).
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
