A minor comment as well, looks like the SCA download page is missing the MD5 links: http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/sca_downloads.html
-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 12/21/06, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you Venkat for your efforts. A few comments: 1. Link to getting started doc for under Java is wrong. go to http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/sca_documentation.html and click on Getting started with SCA Java Milestone 2 Release< http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/java_sca_overview.html > 2. I am not sure what the numbering and indented sections on this page mean. It is the index from Getting started with SCA Java? You may want to get rid of it. 3. I wish there was an easy way on the download page to identify what's in the release. Can we we link to readme? 4. Can we get rid of the word 'perscribed by OSOA' in the on http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/java_sca_overview.html "Tuscany provides a Java implementation for the SCA specifications * prescribed* by OSOA." To "Tuscany Java SCA provides an implementation for the SCA specification that is available on www.osoa.org" Haleh On 12/21/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Thanks for looking this up and giving in your feedback. I have taken in > the > comments from each of you and have made the necessary changes. Please > check > them out at http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/. > > Unless I hear any significant change to be made, I plan to commit this > tomorrow and hope the site refreshes when folks in the US start their day. > > Thanks > > - Venkat > > On 12/21/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Simon Nash wrote: > > > > >5. The Documentation page lists 0.9 specs, and points to > boulder.ibm.com. > > > It's probably best to just remove this list of specs and let people > > > go via osoa.org via the links that you have. It would make sense to > > > also remove the links to white papers as these are on osoa.org. > > > I wouldn't remove this page altogether as it provides a place to > > > put references to documentation that applies to Tuscany as a whole, > > > rather than the individual technologies of SCA/SDO/DAS. (Hopefully > > > there will be more of this Tuscany-related material in the future.) > > > > I think we still should have the links here, probably poiting to > > osoa.orginstead of the > > boudler.ibm.com, as we have little more description saying what is > > discussed > > in each spec, where in the osoa.org, we just have the links to the spec > > and > > that's it. > > > > If we really decided that we don't want them here, we should have it > > explicitly saying something like "The specifications is available in the > > osoa.org and you can find them at <direct link like > > > > > http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Component+Architecture+Specifications > > > > > " . This would avoid beginners to get lost trying to find the right > > info... > > > > I think this is also true for any other resources that is available at > > osoa.org > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > On 12/21/06, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Luciano Resende wrote: > > > > > > > Couple comments : > > > > > > > > - Do we need FAQ entry on the Outlines for SCA, SDO and DAS ? > > > > > > > We could link these under the main FAQ page that is present on the > > > outline. This would make the outline 3 lines shorter, which helps > > > reduce scrolling with smaller displays or larger fonts. Anyone > > > wanting to see FAQs for SCA/SDO/DAS would still find these easily > > > and quickly by following the outline link to the main FAQ page > > > and following the links there. The main FAQ page would contain > > > FAQs that apply to the whole of Tuscany, as well as links to the > > > sub-pages for SCA, SDO, and DAS. > > > > > > > - There are still some broken links, maybe it's good to have at > > least > > > an > > > > empty page for those links.... > > > > > > > > BTW, Looks good in Firefox... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > >
