Simon Nash wrote:

5. The Documentation page lists 0.9 specs, and points to boulder.ibm.com.
   It's probably best to just remove this list of specs and let people
  go via osoa.org via the links that you have.  It would make sense to
   also remove the links to white papers as these are on osoa.org.
   I wouldn't remove this page altogether as it provides a place to
   put references to documentation that applies to Tuscany as a whole,
   rather than the individual technologies of SCA/SDO/DAS.  (Hopefully
   there will be more of this Tuscany-related material in the future.)

I think we still should have the links here, probably poiting to
osoa.orginstead of the
boudler.ibm.com, as we have little more description saying what is discussed
in each spec, where in the osoa.org, we just have the links to the spec and
that's it.

If we really decided that we don't want them here, we should have it
explicitly saying something like "The specifications is available in the
osoa.org and you can find them at <direct link like
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Component+Architecture+Specifications>
" . This would avoid beginners to get lost trying to find the right info...

I think this is also true for any other resources that is available at
osoa.org

--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende

On 12/21/06, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Luciano Resende wrote:

> Couple comments :
>
>   - Do we need FAQ entry on the Outlines for SCA, SDO and DAS ?
>
We could link these under the main FAQ page that is present on the
outline.  This would make the outline 3 lines shorter, which helps
reduce scrolling with smaller displays or larger fonts.  Anyone
wanting to see FAQs for SCA/SDO/DAS would still find these easily
and quickly by following the outline link to the main FAQ page
and following the links there.  The main FAQ page would contain
FAQs that apply to the whole of Tuscany, as well as links to the
sub-pages for SCA, SDO, and DAS.

>   - There are still some broken links, maybe it's good to have at least
an
> empty page for those links....
>
> BTW, Looks good in Firefox...
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to