Luciano Resende wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
5. The Documentation page lists 0.9 specs, and points to boulder.ibm.com.
It's probably best to just remove this list of specs and let people
go via osoa.org via the links that you have. It would make sense to
also remove the links to white papers as these are on osoa.org.
I wouldn't remove this page altogether as it provides a place to
put references to documentation that applies to Tuscany as a whole,
rather than the individual technologies of SCA/SDO/DAS. (Hopefully
there will be more of this Tuscany-related material in the future.)
I think we still should have the links here, probably poiting to
osoa.orginstead of the
boudler.ibm.com, as we have little more description saying what is
discussed
in each spec, where in the osoa.org, we just have the links to the spec and
that's it.
The problem with having a "shadow" list is that inevitably it will fall
behind the master list on osoa.org as new levels are published over there.
I think the only case where we should have our own links is where we need
to point to specific levels of the specs, for example where these match
particular Tuscany releases. The new "Releases" pages might be the right
place to do this.
If we really decided that we don't want them here, we should have it
explicitly saying something like "The specifications is available in the
osoa.org and you can find them at <direct link like
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Component+Architecture+Specifications>
" . This would avoid beginners to get lost trying to find the right info...
I think this is also true for any other resources that is available at
osoa.org
I think this is what the new site is doing at the moment.
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
