Hi Jim, are you still working on this ? I'm getting the same issue on java/samples/sca/webapp
-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 1/2/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For now I specified the target service in the SCDL. I think we should keep it like that in the sample as picking the default service in a composite is fragile and not really best practice. I'll work on getting rid of the NPE in a bit as it is a fairly simple fix. Jim On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Jim Marino wrote: > Yes that's right. I'll fix it in a bit. > > Jim > > On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I ran into a NPE with the latest code in the InnerComposite >> sample. Please see the stack trace below. >> >> java.lang.NullPointerException >> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.hash >> (ConcurrentHashMap.java:172) >> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get >> (ConcurrentHashMap.java:745) >> at >> org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.getServi >> ce(CompositeComponentExtension.java:252) >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect >> (ConnectorImpl.java:616) >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect >> (ConnectorImpl.java:503) >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.handleReference >> (ConnectorImpl.java:430) >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect >> (ConnectorImpl.java:90) >> at >> org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.prepare( >> CompositeComponentExtension.java:368) >> at >> org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.prepare( >> CompositeComponentExtension.java:370) >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.deployer.DeployerImpl.deploy >> (DeployerImpl.java:98) >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.launcher.LauncherImpl.bootApplication >> (LauncherImpl.java:213) >> at org.apache.tuscany.test.SCATestCase.setUp(SCATestCase.java:88) >> at innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase.setUp >> (InnerCompositeTestCase.java:31) >> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:125) >> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) >> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) >> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) >> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118) >> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208) >> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203) >> at >> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run( >> JUnit3TestReference.java:128) >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run >> (TestExecution.java:38) >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:460) >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:673) >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:386) >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:196) >> >> In this case, the qualified name for the target is the component >> name and the portName is null and a NPE is thrown. >> >> The SCA spec defines the following syntax for wire-target-URI: >> >> <component-name>/<service-name> >> o where the target is a service of a component. The specification >> of the service name is optional if the target component only has >> one service with a compatible interface >> >> If service-name is not present (portName==null), we should check >> and pick the only one service. Am I right? >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
