Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Yes, what Luciano is suggesting here makes sense to me as well.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 4/4/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebastien wrote:
> I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but
alpha1 is
>probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then.
Should we leave like 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, and only add M3 or alpha1
when
we branch/tag for release, together with the removal of SNAPSHOT ? This
would make trunk always with same version id, right ?
On 4/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Forgot to ask one question:
> >
> > We have inconsistent version ids for artifacts in the trunk, do you
> > plan to reconcile them? If so, what should the version id look
like? I
> > propose that we use something like 1.0-incubating-alpha1-SNAPSHOT to
> > reflect the fact that we're working toward a 1.0 release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
>
> Yes I plan to reconcile them, like this:
>
> >
> >> - Version of our modules will be specified once in
java/sca/pom.xml,
> >> child poms don't need specify a version as they get it from their
> parent
> >>
>
> I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but
alpha1 is
> probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
OK then, it makes sense to me too, I'll change to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
