On 5/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, > > I tried a bit to rename some of the packages (not adding sca yet) but > I just realized that it became a bit out of control with the flood of > check-ins. > > Maybe the best way is that we agree on the naming convention for the > core-spi and core and then have one person to do all the refactoring > in one shot once we see a functionally stable code base. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:48 PM > Subject: Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release > > >> Hi.. .what about the workitem related to renaming the core-spi to >> include >> 'sca' for packages. Is it a good time to do this ? Thanks >> >> - Venkat >> >> On 5/4/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > ant elder wrote: >>> > > There's been a lot of progress, things are starting to look good >>> and >>> > most >>> > > things on the wiki page ( >>> > > >>> > >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents >>> >>> > ) >>> > > >>> > > look like they're nearing completion. So I think what we should >>> do is >>> > > aim at >>> > > creating an SVN branch for the release around Tuesday next week, >>> > > start >>> > > being >>> > > more controlled about what changes go into the branch and start >>> > > publishing >>> > > candidate distributions from that, then when we think it looks >>> ok > > vote >>> > on >>> > > the final release candidate from that, hopefully by the end of next >>> > week. >>> > > Does this sound ok to everyone? It does mean most changes anyone >>> > > wants >>> > in >>> > > should be tried to be committed by Tuesday. >>> > > >>> > > The latest distribution downloads to try out are available at: >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/ >>> > > >>> > > There's now a Java-SCA-0.90 version in Jira so any bugs found or >>> things >>> > > people want to get done should be added there: >>> > > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 >>> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ...ant >>> > > >>> > >>> > +1 from me. Like you said a lot of what we had on the Wiki are near >>> > completion. One of the most important items I think is to complete >>> the >>> > clean up of the code base and simplify further some of our interfaces >>> > for extensions, but Tuesday looks reasonable to me. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Jean-Sebastien >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > Sounds like a good timescale to me. Gives time to finish the sample >>> builds >>> and readmes. >>> >>> Simon >>> >> There has been many commits and good progress the last few days, so I spent a little bit of time checking the status of the trunk. Here's a summary of what I found: - The code cleanup is almost complete, I think there's a little bit work left to refactor one last .spi. package, remove a few dead classes, also it looks like Raymond has started to clean up the Scope registry and WorkContext I'm not sure if it's finished or not. - The Java, Script and RMI extensions are now stable, as well as the sample implementation, binding, and data binding extensions. - It looks like we have a reasonable Web app story with a servlet context listener, but it may require a little bit of cleanup to avoid confusion with sca-contribution.xml. I'm also not sure if it allows to expose Web Services from a Web app, or if we even want to do that now. Main todo's that I could think of: - Port the Web Service binding extension to the latest code, as it's really important to have, and is also used by many integration tests. - Run RAT and check licenses and notices. - Check why the itest/spec-api test cases are failing. - Create a JAR containing the source of our runtime, to help debugging in an IDE. - Are the samples build.xml finished? - I have ported the Spring extension to the latest code but need to do a little bit of cleanup tomorrow before committing it. - I'm not sure about the JSONRPC binding, wouldn't it be nice to have it too? - Lazy loading of our modules to avoid loading too many dependencies when using tuscany-sca-all.jar. - Rename the packages to *.sca.* but I would suggest to delay this to a later point some time next week after our first RC. And there's probably a few more :) -- Jean-Sebastien
We've made tons of progress on all these things so the release is looking really close to being ready and the time approaching to either cut a branch or switch to a more controlled commit mode on the trunk. Hopefully we could do this tomorrow, so this is just a fyi to start getting all your last minute changes in... ...ant
