Wow 571 license problems! after being clean for 0.90 just a month ago.
One question this brings up is what is actually intended to be
included in
0.91? There's been quite a few new extensions and demo's etc added
recently
but no one has said they want those included in 0.91. Should they be by
default or should we just include things that are mentioned on the
release
wiki page? If so anyone else care to help clean things up, add missing
license headers, check the distribution works and includes
dependencies etc?
The implementation.das is including an entire database in the src, is
there
any way that could be generated by the tests?
...ant
On 6/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ant. So could we all please use this wiki page to put down
things
> that are going to be increments over 0.90.
>
> Also I run the RAT on the trunk - just java/sca and here is the
report. I
> intend to go and fix the missing headers just ahead of cutting the
branch.
> Before that if anybody would like to jump in and help with this,
please feel
> free do so.
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Esvkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt>
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
> On 6/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Taking a branch around the 20th sounds ok to me.
> >
> > The high level things I'm focusing on for the 0.91 release are:
> >
> > - Simplification of using script components (working without
> > .componentType
> > side files)
> > - First cut of the simpler binding/implementation SPI
> > - clean up of ajax and jsonrpc bindings
> > - The EJB binding
> >
> > I'd also said to someone on the user list I'd get WS services without
> > wsdl
> > working so will try to do that as well.
> >
> > Most of the code for those is close-ish to being done, though there's
> > still
> > a whole lot of related sample work to get done.
> >
> > I'd started a wiki page for 0.91 at
> >
> >
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 6/13/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the faith and encouragement. This is going to be my
first
> > > experience and I am sure of getting all the help from you folks to
> > pull
> > > this
> > > off successfully.
> > >
> > > So, to start with, I propose to cut a branch around June 20th,
> > 2007. If
> > > people are ok with this, then all that we'd like to be a part of
> > 0.91should
> > > get in by then (June 20th, 2007). Does that work fine with
everybody?
> > >
> > > Also, I'd also like to list down the significant additions /
> > enhancements
> > > over 0.90 for the Release Notes. You can state the item here on
this
> > > thread
> > > and I will take care of recording it.
> > >
> > > - Venkat
> > >
> > > On 6/13/07, Simon Nash < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 from me too. I'm sure Venkat will do a fine job.
> > > >
> > > > Simon
> > > >
> > > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me for
Venkat
> > as
> > > > >> 0.91 RM
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Simon
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 from me
> > > > >
> > > > >
