+1 for including it in the release.

  Simon

ant elder wrote:

This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of Felix
dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include it.

   ...ant

On 8/20/07, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Ant,

I will take a look at the intermittent test failure in itest/osgi
-implementation.


Thank you...

Regards,

Rajini

On 8/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi SCA/OSGi-ers,

Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in moving
this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release
in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for that.
Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing
implemention.osgi code has been moved off  SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0 so
we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests still
has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).

  ...ant


On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi SCA/OSGi-ers.

I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole)
to
host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time
to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in
particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts
ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.

Cheers,
Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration

Sebastien,

Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
complete.


Thank you...

Regards,

Rajini

On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Bill Barnhill wrote:

Hi,

As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the

SCA-OSGi

integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions,

using

OSGi as
an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an

extension

mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry

capabilities.

I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and

Graham

have
been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under
contrib
with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
implementation)

What do you think?


Hi Bill,

That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different
from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package

them

as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded

that

will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
jar/bundle dependency management.

Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do

you

have code that we can look at?

Any questions or issues that we can help with?

On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on

supporting

the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the

SCA

assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?

Thanks

--
Jean-Sebastien




---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
and then destroy it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to