Mike Edwards wrote:
For my 1 cent on this point.
The BPEL code is still raw at this stage and I feel it could do with a
few more tweaks before it is really ready for prime time - I certainly
still have a lot of trouble getting it to work - and I'm working on it!!
I'm not familiar with the BPEL code but I do remember what happened
with 1.0.1 and I don't think we should repeat that experience.
If there are broken things causing serious impact to users for which
we already have a fix that's relatively small and localized, these
could be considered. I'd expect there to be a very small list of
JIRAs falling into this category.
For new features, or bugs that are not causing serious user impact,
or things that need extensive code changes, or things that are not
fully ready and tested yet, I think we should defer them to the
next full release.
Simon
Yours, Mike.
Luciano Resende wrote:
In the past, there has been various requests for this feature in the
user/dev list, and unfortunately I couldn't get it ready by 1.2.
It seems like a reasonable time to add it now that we are going to
make this 1.2.1 release. BTW, the changes are localized and not so
big.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Any chance I could add the bpel reference support as part of this
release ? The changes are localized and won't affect other areas.
Is there a user requesting this support? Remembering the 1.0.1
experience, I think we should keep this release as small and focused
as possible.
Simon
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had a request to do an official release that includes the fix for
TUSCANY-2304. I think this is reasonable so would like to do this, it
shouldn't be too hard as its a small fix so its just copying the 1.2
release
tag, applying the fix, spinning the new release artifacts and
voting. I
know
we tried this before with 1.0.1 but that ended up with so much new
function
it made it harder to get out, if 1.2.1 is kept really focused I
hope it
would be easier. I'd like to start this off tomorrow if no one has
any
objections, WDYT?
There was also a suggestion that maybe a fix for TUSCANY-2251 could
get
into
this, is that likely to be small and ready?
...ant
