Hi Kelvin, 1. As Ant pointed out, Release note needs to be updated to capture the very important announcement that was made for SDO Tuscany and that is completion of SDO spec 2.1. 2. Tuscany 1143 was identified as an unresolved defect for Beta. Should this be addressed in 1.0 or can it be moved to post 1.0? 3. some of the links on this page do not work: C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html 4. Is commentary_for_x the level of trace? If yes, would it make sense to change the name to trace_detailed, trace_medium, trace_low? 5. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html.. javadoc for Class SampleBase. Are these SPIs that one would use to develop samples? If yes, the text reads as if this and the sampleInfra are not interesting to users. 6. Samples Overview: a) In the overview parag you have a link to Tuscany main site for the section you say contribute pack to the project. It would be better if this linked to getInvolved page. b) You could remove the first sentence since it does not really make sense. How about .. Apache Tuscany SDO Samples are provided here to help users learn SDO.'index by SDO subproject ' lists the different samples available to you. These samples provide a starting point for learning SDO and can be extended and enhanced to experiment with other available SDO features. Please help us enhance these samples by sending your feedback to Tuscany mailing list or join us and contribute to this project <get involved link>. 7. Running samples: can you modify the test to make it clear that BINARY-BASE is a variable that needs to be set in the script? For example... In order to run the samples, locate runSamples script file for the environment you work on under samples directory. Modify the file to point BINARY-BASE to the directory on your file system where lib and samples reside. You are then ready to run the samples. btw. I did this and I get an error. It complaints that it cannot find executeSamples class file. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>REM under the License.
C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set BINARY_BASE= c:\sdoRel1\tuscan y-sdo-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set RELEASE=-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set LIB= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set CLASSPATH= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\sample-sdo--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib\sdo-api-r2.1--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-lib--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-impl--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-tools--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ codegen-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-2.2.3.jar; c: \sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-change-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tusca ny-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incuba ting\lib\common-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\xsd-2.2.3.j ar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\stax-api-1.0.1.jar C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>java target.org.apache.tuscany.sam ples.sdo.ExecuteSamples Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: target/org/apache/tus cany/samples/sdo/ExecuteSamples 8. This link C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\samples\src\main\java\org\apache\tuscany\samples\sdo\advanced\package.html refers to main menu which does not exist. Also, shouldn't this be called Service Data Object Advanced Samples instead of Advanced Service Data Object Samples? Same issue with intermediate and basic package. 9. Nice detail in the index file. :) On 7/16/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raymond, I'm going to reference your request in thread that is determining release contents. I added a comment to 1436. Will you be able to provide a fix for either of these in the short term? Kelvin. On 16/07/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436 > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tuscany Users" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 PM > Subject: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1 > > > > I've posted an RC1 of SDO Java 1.0-incubating at [1] > > Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] > > I cut a branch for this release at [3] > > > > Please take a look at this release candidate. There are a few more > fixes > > due to go into the release, which should be ready by the end of this > > week, > > so there will be a respin of this candidate, but I'd particularly like > to > > get feedback on the structure of the distribution, as a lot has changed > > in > > this respect since the beta1. Also please feed back on the install, > build > > and run samples instructions since these have all changed too. > > > > Best Regards, Kelvin. > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC1/ > > [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/ > > [3] > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-1.0-incubating/ > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
