On 16/07/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kelvin, 1. As Ant pointed out, Release note needs to be updated to capture the very important announcement that was made for SDO Tuscany and that is completion of SDO spec 2.1.
sure 2. Tuscany 1143 was identified as an unresolved defect for Beta. Should this
be addressed in 1.0 or can it be moved to post 1.0?
I think it's an important one for 1.0 as our runtime metadata organisation is rather messy without this and I think it will probably bite us if we don't. 3. some of the links on this page do not work: C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-
sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html
thanks, I'll check it out. 4. Is commentary_for_x the level of trace? If yes, would it make sense to
change the name to trace_detailed, trace_medium, trace_low?
Two comments here. I'm not sure how esoteric the term "trace" here is. It's very familiar to me, but for someone who has never encountered the term it may not instantly convey the message, whereas I think what I have used does. The second is that it doesn't really do the full job that you might expect of trace. There's no entry/exit messages, no call stack depth representation, and it doesn't tell you anything about what's going on inside SDO; so someone who does understand the term trace might have different expectations. The commentary output conveys the temporal sequence of SDO API calls that must be made in a flattened fashion. 5. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-
sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html.. javadoc for Class SampleBase. Are these SPIs that one would use to develop samples? If yes, the text reads as if this and the sampleInfra are not interesting to users.
I'll take a peek at the pom and try to figure out how to exclude these 6. Samples Overview:
a) In the overview parag you have a link to Tuscany main site for the section you say contribute pack to the project. It would be better if this linked to getInvolved page.
thx b) You could remove the first sentence since it does not really make sense.
How about .. Apache Tuscany SDO Samples are provided here to help users learn SDO.'index by SDO subproject ' lists the different samples available to you. These samples provide a starting point for learning SDO and can be extended and enhanced to experiment with other available SDO features. Please help us enhance these samples by sending your feedback to Tuscany mailing list or join us and contribute to this project <get involved link>.
i'll review and incorporate 7. Running samples: can you modify the test to make it clear that
BINARY-BASE is a variable that needs to be set in the script? For example... In order to run the samples, locate runSamples script file for the environment you work on under samples directory. Modify the file to point BINARY-BASE to the directory on your file system where lib and samples reside. You are then ready to run the samples.
yes, I have a "to do" to make an improvement here (incidentally, I haven't run the runsamples.sh script since I don't yet have a linux environment since my hard drive failure, if someone could verify this it would be great) btw. I did this and I get an error. It complaints that it cannot find
executeSamples class file. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>REM under the License. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set BINARY_BASE= c:\sdoRel1\tuscan y-sdo-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set RELEASE=-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set LIB= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>set CLASSPATH= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\sample-sdo--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib\sdo-api-r2.1--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-lib--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-impl--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-tools--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ codegen-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-2.2.3.jar; c: \sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-change-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tusca ny-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incuba ting\lib\common-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\xsd-2.2.3.j ar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\stax-api-1.0.1.jar C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samples>java target.org.apache.tuscany.sam ples.sdo.ExecuteSamples Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: target/org/apache/tus cany/samples/sdo/ExecuteSamples
yes, that would be as expected without having edited binary_base. I'm going to adopt ant's suggestion and set it to ".." by default (or whatever works if you are in the local directory) and make some improvements to the diagnostics 8. This link C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-
sdo-1.0-incubating\samples\src\main\java\org\apache\tuscany\samples\sdo\advanced\package.html refers to main menu which does not exist. Also, shouldn't this be called Service Data Object Advanced Samples instead of Advanced Service Data Object Samples? Same issue with intermediate and basic package.
I'm happy either way with the naming; both scan OK to me. 9. Nice detail in the index file. :) thanks On 7/16/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Raymond, > > I'm going to reference your request in thread that is determining > release > contents. I added a comment to 1436. Will you be able to provide a fix > for > either of these in the short term? > > Kelvin. > > On 16/07/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436 > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Tuscany Users" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 PM > > Subject: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1 > > > > > > > I've posted an RC1 of SDO Java 1.0-incubating at [1] > > > Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] > > > I cut a branch for this release at [3] > > > > > > Please take a look at this release candidate. There are a few more > > fixes > > > due to go into the release, which should be ready by the end of this > > > week, > > > so there will be a respin of this candidate, but I'd particularly > like > > to > > > get feedback on the structure of the distribution, as a lot has > changed > > > in > > > this respect since the beta1. Also please feed back on the install, > > build > > > and run samples instructions since these have all changed too. > > > > > > Best Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > [1] > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC1/ > > > [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/ > > > [3] > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-1.0-incubating/ > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
