On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:09 PM, PGage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Yes, I know bashing the LAT is something of a favorite sport in Los
> Angeles, and in many ways it has always deserved it. But for all of
> its puffy, self-important, brown-nosing indulgence, the LAT has been
> the best newspaper west of the Mississippi, (certainly better than
> anything up here in NoCal) and one of the country's best papers. I
> know there are lots of challenges for daily papers, and even the best
> run company may eventually fail. But the Times as run by the Tribune
> has never had even a decent chance.
>
> The San Jose Mercury News in the 1980s, when it was flush with all that
Silicon Valley money, was an amazing newspaper and one of the best in the
country. Great investigative work and one of the better photo staffs
assembled at one newspaper.  The stuff about Marcos, which won them the
Pulitzer, was fantastic.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Like TV only smarter.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to