On Oct 28, 11:09 am, "Mark J." <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 10:04 am, "Pollak, Melissa F." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Ex-Letterman Writer Calls Workplace Hostile
>
> >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/10/27/arts/AP-US-TV-David-Letterman
> > .html?em
>
> Paul has a direct link to the VF article on the other recent Letterman
> thread.

I commented on this in the afl:

Nell writes:

"Without naming names or digging up decades-old dirt, let’s address
the pertinent questions. Did Dave hit on me? No. Did he pay me enough
extra attention that it was noted by another writer? Yes. Was I aware
of rumors that Dave was having sexual relationships with female
staffers? Yes. Was I aware that other high-level male employees were
having sexual relationships with female staffers? Yes. Did these
female staffers have access to information and wield power
disproportionate to their job titles? Yes. Did that create a hostile
work environment? Yes. Did I believe these female staffers were
benefiting professionally from their personal relationships? Yes. Did
that make me feel demeaned? Completely. Did I say anything at the
time? Sadly, no."

Here's the flaw in her argument: Writers rarely advance to higher
positions on LN and/or LS, Rob Burnett, Maria Pope, and the Stangels
being the only exceptions I can think of offhand. (While the Stangels
have been promoted to co-producers, they've retained their positions
as co-head-writers.)

Nell was there for three months (mid-July to mid-October 1990). Her
(standard) 13-week contract was up, and, by her own acknowledgment,
the producers picked up her option. Which means her work as a writer
was determined to be acceptable and valuable enough to continue her
employment on the show.

Therefore, she can't claim that any favoritism she perceived were
given to others had worked to her detriment. Three months was hardly
enough time to warrant any sort of promotion, especially when her job
position was already pretty high up there to begin with.

If Dave were boinking one of his assistants, it would not have
affected Nell's job position. If Dave were boinking one of the
interns, it would not have affected Nell's job position.

So despite her perception that there were others who were
"benefitting
professionally from their personal relationships," it had no bearing
on her own work responsibilities or advancement potential.

Thus, she has little basis to claim "hostile work environment," as
whatever occurred elsewhere in the building had zero effect on her
own
job.

Again -- she was there for three months.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to