It sounds like it may come down to the numbers of the different types of home video viewers as to how well Redbox and Netflix do against DirecTV and other satellite/cable providers. It's possible that all three could survive, with DirecTV possibly working on smaller margins than it has in the past.
David ________________________________ From: Bradford <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 8:17:37 PM Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] MacWorld's "Hulu Plus" review I agree that Redbox is not a source for much more than the latest mainstream DVD releases. But a majority of people who subscribe to HBO or Showtime are not doing so to watch TV shows or independent films. They are interested in seeing the top box office titles in their homes. And for that, both Redbox and Netflix can offer those titles sooner and cheaper than the premium services on cable. And cheaper than the pay per view cost on DirecTV. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Bruggeman >To: [email protected] >Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 6:35 PM >Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] MacWorld's "Hulu Plus" review > > >Independent of whatever plan you use, if you want to watch TV shows via >streaming or DVD, Redbox isn't on the playground. I have seen some TV >discs >available via Redbox, but it's been very scarce and spotty compared to >Netflix. > > >David > > > > ________________________________ From: Joe Coughlin <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 2:49:20 PM >Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] MacWorld's "Hulu Plus" review > >Because for $15, you get three movies out at a time for as long as you'd >like >AND their streaming service AND you don't have to go anywhere to get it or >return it. Redbox has its place, but it's not going to really hurt Netflix. > > >On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Bradford <[email protected]> wrote: > >Tried Netflix in the early days when it was just a mail order DVD service >and wasn't impressed. I would think a much bigger threat would be Redbox. >I >know of at least three of them within walking distance of my house. And >when I can go online, find out what's at each location and pick up a >movie >for .99, why would I pay $15 a month to a movie service to see those same >titles months later? I do subscribe to HBO but, as I said, that's more >for >their original programming than for the movies. >>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: PGage >>>To: [email protected] >>>Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 1:20 PM >>>Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] MacWorld's "Hulu Plus" review >>> >>> >>>On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Bradford <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have DirecTV and have had similar offers for years. It seems >>> they >>>use the movie services as bargaining chips any time they need to >>>make >>>amends with subscribers. More than once I have called to complain >>>about >>>something they had messed up (usually on my billing) and I was >>>offered X number of months of Showtime for free as an apology. (The >>>only movie service I pay for is HBO - mostly for the original >>>programming.) >>>> >>>> I wouldn't be surprised if their offer of a discount on your pay >>>>services doesn't cost them a thing. I worked in television >>>>production >>>>for the local cable company for 17 years and know that (at that >>>>time >>>>anyway) the subscriber audit for the movie services was only taken >>>>once >>>>a year, usually at the end of the calendar year. So there were all >>>>sorts of offers of free pay services for a certain number of >>>>months to >>>>entice new subscribers since all it cost the cable company was the >>>>labor to hook it up. That is, unless it extended to the audit >>>>date. >>>>Which it never did. Back then they had to send a techie out to >>>>your >>>>house to remove a filter at the pole. Now all it takes is a >>>>computer >>>>stroke. So how much are they really losing to give somebody a >>>>couple of >>>>months of a pay channel for free? >>>> >>>I don't think it cost them anything to give me the offer, but if say, >>>25% >>>of subscribers with max premium subscriptions cancel because of >>>something >>>like netflix cancel over a couple of years, it seems like they might >>>notice that, and want to respond in a more systematic way. I am a >>>pretty >>>slow adopter of new technology, but not the slowest. I assume a lot >>>of >>>people figured out netflix a long time ago, and if I am figuring it >>>out >>>now I would assume a lot more have with the last 6 and next 6 months. >>> >>> >-- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
