On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:00 PM, donz5 <[email protected]> wrote: > Rockefeller's aside, of course, makes much more sense when read in its > proper context instead of relying solely on the HP headline.
Yes it does > And Olbermann put the decision to his viewers, who overwhelmingly > voted for a return to "Worst Persons." This fact impresses me not-at-all. > It sometimes helps to formulate an opinion about a show after having, > you know, actually watched the show. Watched it for years. Watched his last two "special" comments. It is becoming my new SNL. For years, I had hopes that SNL could return to some of its former glory and would try to catch one or two episodes a year in the hopes somebody there would be able to pull Lorne Michaels' head out of his ass. I did the same thing with the post-Sorkin seasons of "West Wing," hoping somehow the quality could be restored. I was delusional, of course, but I was a fan. I appear to be doing the same thing with "Countdown," and am just as frequently disappointed. > As for Roger -- Deutschland über Alies. Yeah, he's a kick, ain't he? -- Kevin M. (RPCV) -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
